July 28, 2021

Deciding on Painters’ Folly

Chadds Ford Township residents listen to Carol Quigley, standing at left, discuss a project designed to preserve Painter’s Folly for possible adaptive reuse.

When Chadds Ford Township supervisors announced in December of 2017 that they intended to buy Painter’s Folly, they had no firm idea of what they wanted to do with the old house on Route 1. Supervisors’ Chairman Frank Murphy said at the time that they wanted to keep it out of the hands of a developer and save it as open space.

The house is historically significant with the local art scene. In the early 20th century, it was home to illustrator Howard Pyle. And it was Pyle who taught N.C. Wyeth and others in his school a little farther down Route 1 in Turner’s Mill, the current Chadds Ford Township municipal building.

Painter’s Folly was later the home of George and Helen Sipala, who became friends with Andrew Wyeth. Wyeth used the house and the Sipala’s in several of his paintings.

In an interview several weeks after the township’s 2017 announcement, Supervisor Noelle Barbone acknowledged they had no specific use in mind. However, she suggested the township could partner with the Sanderson Museum or the Chadds Ford Historical Society to find a use for the 200-year-old house. Yet, she didn’t know what that type of partnership that could be.

The township officially became the owner in early 2018, paying $625,000 for the house and its four acres next to the Brandywine Battlefield Park. Now three years later, supervisors have still made no decision.

With that in mind, the township held the first of two information-gathering sessions with residents and restorative architect Dale Frens, and project manager, Carol Quigley on July 27. The two are now with Patterhn Ives, contracted to develop a plan for the property, with resident input

Barbone said before the meeting that there are some specific concerns. The township wants residents and visitors to have some access to the house, but it must be ADA compatible. She also said supervisors would like to see some income from the property.

“Not a lot,” Barbone said, “Just enough to break even. But we want to preserve the site and its history.”

Maintaining the house — a three-story structure of 58,000 square feet — is expensive, as former owner Helen Sipala can attest. She tells a story about how she and her husband were going to sell the house in the mid-1990s because the upkeep was so costly. When Wyeth heard of their intention, he told them he would pay for the improvements out of his own pocket.

The July 27 meeting with Quigley and Frens ranged from an historic overview of the house, and the land surrounding the home before the house was built. Then came a review of possible uses and the need to overcome some difficulties in making the house accessible.

Historically, the property was once part of what was called Lafayette Farm Estates, according to Frens. However, he said when Samuel Painter built the house in about 1857, it was initially called Lafayette Manor.

(The reference to Lafayette refers to the adjacent property with the Gilpin House. Local folklore says the Marquis de Lafayette, a junior general and Gen. George Washington’s aide during the Battle of Brandywine, used the Gilpin House as a headquarters, something some historians dispute.)

Some of the ideas suggested for adaptive reuse of the house were a bed and breakfast, art studios, and intern apartments for the upper floors while keeping the first floor as a meeting or event space.

Potential drawbacks include maintenance costs, uneven terrain, insufficient parking, and equally poor ingress. Getting into the property is right-in only off Route 1, and the driveway comes up very quickly. Quigley said she often must do a U-turn farther down Route 1 to get into Painter’s Folly because the driveway comes up so fast that she misses the turn.

No decisions were made during the session, and a second information-gathering meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, Aug. 24 at 7 p.m. Attendees who come at 6 will get a tour of the house.

About Rich Schwartzman

Rich Schwartzman has been reporting on events in the greater Chadds Ford area since September 2001 when he became the founding editor of The Chadds Ford Post. In April 2009 he became managing editor of ChaddsFordLive. He is also an award-winning photographer.

Deciding on Painters’ Folly Read More »

Musings: Eminent ugliness

There are many ugly things that governments do. Slavery, war, genocide, and subjugation, to name a few. But, of course, they do those things because those who want to rule over others say it’s for your good, or maybe it’s for the greater good. What’s the greater good? It’s whatever rulers choose that to mean.

Sometimes those in government will smile to your face, tell you what great things they want to do, and once enough people agree, they take your property. It’s called eminent domain. It’s a forced sale against the owners’ wishes, and those property owners play hell trying to fight it.

It’s an ancient practice, rooted in the time when kings and other tyrants felt they owned all the lands in which they ruled. Might made right.

In the United States, eminent domain wears a pretty face. The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says property may be taken only for public use, and it requires just compensation paid to the owner.

Sometimes, though, that pretty face hides an iron fist. During the New Deal, courts expanded the concept of public use to mean public purpose, which translates to almost anything a government wants to do. It’s easy to change meanings when you control the dictionary.

In 2005, the United States Supreme Court justices opined in Kelo v. City of New London that the local government could take a person’s residential property and sell it to private developers. There would be no real public use involved in the forced sale — no highway or hospital would be built — but the city of New London could collect more taxes. A grossly immoral decision designed to increase New London’s tax haul.

Now let’s come closer to home and closer in time. School boards in Downingtown and Tredyffrin/Easttown like taking property, too, even when forcing a property owner to take less than what someone else is offering.

Toll Bros. offered a property owner $4.5 million for a 13-acre parcel. The Tredyffrin/Easttown School District said it would move to take the land through eminent domain and set a price of $2.7 million.

Before the COVID pandemic, the Downingtown School District voted to start eminent domain proceedings against property owners because district officials said they’d eventually need to build a new school. But there were no plans for a new school. And the property owners didn’t know about the district’s intent until a week before the vote. As a result, one family had to stop taking in foster children because of the decision, and other owners risk losing businesses.

Last month it was reported that East Goshen Township wants to take a family farm for two miles of a walking trail along Paoli Pike, a trail some have referred to as a trail to nowhere.

On July 12, during the final session of the Crebilly II conditional use hearings in Westtown Township, several people called for the use of eminent domain.

An attorney representing Birmingham Township said eminent domain should be used to take property from a Thornbury Township farmer to make room for a left turn lane at Route 926 and S. New Street. Another person said eminent domain should be used to take the entire 320-plus acre Crebilly Farm so that it could not be developed.

And now we come to Chadds Ford Township, where eminent domain is under consideration for the Walkable Chadds Ford project. Property could be taken via the forced sale from property owners at the four corners of the Route 1 and Creek Road/Station Way Road intersection — Hank’s Place, Leader’s Sunoco, the little strip owned by Casey Lafferty with the U.S. Post Office and Agave restaurant, and the small parcel with a few offices between Creek Road and Antica owned by the Grace family.

Two of the four property owners in question acknowledged getting notice from the township. Jim Leader learned that a piece of his gas station is wanted for the project. A letter from the township said that an appraiser would determine how much Leader would be paid for whatever they take.

The letter, dated April 30, 2021, referencing Walkable Chadds Ford and signed by the township manager reads in part:

“The Chadds Ford Board of Supervisors has decided, based upon comprehensive studies, to construct or improve the above-referenced highway project. The completion of this project will require the acquisition of a portion of your property…”

Joe Grace said his daughter Jackie Grace-Hochman received the same notification, adding that the township will have to pay him a lot of money if it wants to take a piece of his property.

Now, the goals of the Walkable Chadds Ford project sound nice:
“Enhance pedestrian, cyclist, and motorist safety;
Calm traffic;
Create non-vehicular connections between Village destinations;
Extend the length of visits to the Village
Foster & sustain economic development.”

But will Walkable Chadds Ford really be of benefit to the township as a whole? That remains to be seen.

Will it really foster economic development? There’s no new shopping, recreational, or entertainment venue planned for the village. An idea for such a multi-use development was discussed briefly three years ago, but that went nowhere. Residents didn’t want it. So, where will people walk to, and where will they park to begin their walk?

Those have been the questions almost from the beginning. And there are new questions: Who else will be forced to sell off pieces of property to make the Walkable Chadds Ford project a success? And just what does success mean in this regard?

As practiced today, eminent domain is nothing more than a piggish sovereign taking what it wants, while smiling. It’s still ugly, even when wearing lipstick.

About Rich Schwartzman

Rich Schwartzman has been reporting on events in the greater Chadds Ford area since September 2001 when he became the founding editor of The Chadds Ford Post. In April 2009 he became managing editor of ChaddsFordLive. He is also an award-winning photographer.

Musings: Eminent ugliness Read More »

Police Log July 28: Car theft, drug bust, deception

Pennsylvania State Police

Media Barracks

State police are investigating a report of a vehicle stolen in Chadds Ford on July 18. Police said an unknown suspect, described only as a white male wearing dark clothing, went into the David Dodge dealership and stole a gray 2021 Jeep Gladiator.

Police said they arrested José Gonzalez, 40, of Philadelphia, for giving false identification to police on July 3. Troopers said they stopped Gonzalez for a vehicle code violation on Route 202 at Oakland Road, but he falsely identified himself. They also discovered there was an active arrest warrant out of Philadelphia for him.

Avondale Barracks

Isiah Dennis-Reed, 31, of Coatesville, was arrested for DUI on July 4, according to a state police report. The report said the suspect was stopped for traffic violations in the 1500 block of Doe Run Road at 1 a.m. and that he exhibited signs of intoxication. He was arrested after a field sobriety test was conducted, the report said.

A 35-year-old man from Baltimore was arrested on drug possession charges in Kennett Township on July 17. The arrest followed a traffic stop on Route 1 at 4:24 p.m. Police said the vehicle owner, who was a passenger, consented to have the vehicle searched. Troopers subsequently found marijuana and related paraphernalia. The driver claimed the marijuana was his, and he admitted to smoking earlier in the day. A field sobriety test indicated impairment. Neither the driver nor the owner was named in the report.

Kennett Square Police Department

Police said they arrested Sarah Cassidy, 37, of Kennett Square, on theft by deception charges. According to the report, Cassidy was involved in a fundraising effort following the fire at Victory Brewing and Magnolia Place Apartments in January. Cassidy allegedly received an overwhelming amount of donations based on false pretenses saying she and her family were involved in the Magnolia Place fire. Charges were filed on July 26.

Carlos Pantoja-Duran, 25, of Kennett Square, was arrested for DUI and related traffic offenses after being stopped for traveling at a high rate of speed through a parking lot and then struck a curb as he was leaving the parking lot, police said. According to the report, Pantoja-Duran admitted to driving with a suspended driver’s license, and officers observed indicators suggesting intoxication. Police also said they saw a small bag of suspected marijuana in the center cup holder. Police took Pantoja-Duran into custody for suspicion of DUI, possession of marijuana, and other related traffic offenses on July 26.

About CFLive Staff

See Contributors Page https://chaddsfordlive.com/writers/

Police Log July 28: Car theft, drug bust, deception Read More »

Scroll to Top