Tax reform? Not likely



18 pt
18 pt


/* Style Definitions */
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}

U.S. Sens. Judd Gregg, R-N.H. and Ron Wyden, D-Ore.,
may be looking in the right direction even if they’re stepping the wrong way.
And they sure won’t allow things to go the necessary distance.

The two senators, earlier this week, unveiled
a bipartisan plan that they say will streamline the IRS tax code, raising the
minimum tax bracket from 10 to 15 percent, but bringing about an overall tax
break, they say, for the middle class.

Streamlining the IRS tax code is a
good thing. Indeed, even IRS Chairman Douglas
Shulman said a month ago that he has to get his taxes done by a professional
because the code is too complex for him to do his taxes himself.

Now granted, Mr. Shulman’s income is likely based on more than what
might show on his government issued W-2. But if the tax code is too complicated
for him, it must be even more frustrating for the average person who has a
small business, or even just a regular job with a number of exemptions.

It’s being reported that the number of tax brackets would be reduced to
three under the proposed plan—
15, 25 and 35 percent—and would, according to a
Wall Street Journal story by
Patrick Yoest, “alleviate the
headache the tax code causes individuals and businesses trying to sort through
its minutiae.”

The report
also said, “
Messrs. Gregg and Wyden assert that the average individual or family
earning less than $200,000 would do ‘as well or better’ under their plan than
current tax law, in large part because the plan would nearly triple the
standard deduction.

"’Many taxpayers who currently itemize will find it more
advantageous to switch to the standard deduction which will both reduce their
tax bills and eliminate the burden of maintaining records and receipts needed
to document itemized deductions,’ the plan states. Most taxpayers would be able
to use a one-page form to submit their taxes, according to Messrs. Wyden and

Such may or may not be the final result of the bill. The other members
of Congress have yet to get their hands on it and twist it out of shape, as
they are wont to do.

And such a goal may not be as lofty an idea as many might think. The
easier it is for a person to file and pay taxes, the easier it is for
government to get our hard-earned dollars. And this is a nation that’s trillions
of dollars in debt, with no agreed upon plan to get out of debt. Some members
of Congress don’t even think there should be any rush to get out of that debt.

We agree with U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas. The income tax itself should
be repealed and replaced by nothing. Mr. Paul recently said that the income tax
accounts for 45 percent of the federal government’s income, yet to cut the size
and cost of government by 45 percent would mean only that the size would be the
same as under the Clinton administration.

While we would like to see the elimination of both the income tax and
the debt, we don’t suggest anyone hold their breath. For that matter, don’t
hold your breath for the Gregg/
Wyden measure either.


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

About CFLive Staff

See Contributors Page



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.